High Standard Stainless Steel With Strict Inspection
Cobalt-Based Superalloys in Medical Implants: A Complete Guide to Biocompatibility and Wear Resistance
The EU Medical Device Regulation established cobalt as a substance of concern in May 2025 which creates worldwide uncertainty for implant manufacturers. Cobalt-chromium alloys continue to be the preferred material for hip bearings which need to endure 10 million loading cycles each year. Engineers face a present-day challenge because they must balance two opposing forces that include regulatory requirements and mechanical requirements when choosing materials for crucial life-saving systems.
The environment requires you to obtain precise information which enables your navigation through this space. The guide supplies metallurgical knowledge which helps you make informed choices about selecting alloys for new orthopedic devices or evaluating existing specifications according to new regulatory requirements. Our investigation will focus on two main aspects: the scientific principles that determine cobalt alloy performance and the actual processes of biocompatibility testing and the 2025 regulatory changes which affect your supply chain operations.
The guide presents four main topics which include: studying the essential material properties that establish cobalt alloys as essential materials for high-wear situations, examining the manufacturing processes which determine biocompatibility outcomes, evaluating the complete set of 2025 regulatory standards and describing how to choose alloys for particular clinical purposes.
What Are Cobalt-Based Superalloys?

The extreme environments require the use of cobalt-based superalloys which function as high-performance materials. The medical applications of these alloys achieve superior wear resistance and mechanical strength through their combination of cobalt with chromium and molybdenum and specific trace elements. The primary alloy system for medical implants is cobalt-chromium-molybdenum, commonly designated as CoCrMo or by its ASTM specification numbers. The cast version of this alloy operates under the ASTM F75 standard while the wrought and forged versions operate under the ASTM F1537 standard. The specifications establish specific chemical composition requirements which state that chromium must be present at 27 to 30 percent to protect against corrosion and molybdenum requires a 5 to 7 percent presence to boost strength and enable grain refinement and carbon must remain below 0.35 percent to block carbide formation and nickel must stay under 0.5 percent based on the specific grade.
The performance of cobalt alloys depends on their crystal structure. The alloys display a face-centered cubic (FCC) structure at room temperature which results in soft and ductile behavior. The material undergoes a phase transition to hexagonal close-packed (HCP) structure when it experiences mechanical stress or high temperatures. The transformation process strengthens the material while enhancing its fatigue resistance which functions as an essential property for implants that face millions of loading cycles.
Cobalt alloys have been used in medical applications for more than 50 years. The first orthopedic applications emerged in the 1960s, with the Vitallium alloy establishing the standard for hip prostheses. The material has developed through three stages which include traditional investment casting and wrought processing that boosts mechanical properties and current additive manufacturing methods which improve biocompatibility and preserve performance.
Material Properties: Why Cobalt Alloys Excel in Load-Bearing Applications

Dr. Sarah Chen created the bearing surface for a new total knee system which her team tested through six material candidates under simulated walking tests. The cobalt-chromium specimens reached their fifth million cycle test when they maintained surface integrity according to specifications. The titanium samples showed measurable wear scars, and the ceramic alternatives exhibited microfracture patterns that concerned the safety review board. The superior hardness of cobalt alloy produced predictable long-term performance outcomes.
The situation demonstrates that cobalt-based superalloys remain the primary choice for high-wear medical applications which require intensive testing.
Mechanical Performance Specifications
Cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloys deliver mechanical properties that exceed most alternative implant materials:
|
Property |
CoCrMo (ASTM F75) |
Ti-6Al-4V |
316L Stainless |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Tensile Strength |
655-897 MPa |
895-930 MPa |
485-620 MPa |
|
Yield Strength |
450-648 MPa |
825-870 MPa |
170-310 MPa |
|
Fatigue Strength |
207-310 MPa |
510-620 MPa |
190-270 MPa |
|
Hardness |
25-35 HRC |
30-36 HRC |
20-25 HRC |
|
Elastic Modulus |
210-253 GPa |
110 GPa |
193 GPa |
|
Wear Resistance |
Excellent |
Moderate |
Poor |
The orthopedic field particularly benefits from the fatigue resistance demonstrated by wrought CoCrMo (ASTM F1537) material. The alloys from this study preserve structural strength through tests which exceed 10 million cycles under testing that simulates human physiological conditions. The extended durability of the system results in longer operational times for medical implants while it decreases the need for surgical replacement procedures.
Wear Resistance Mechanisms
Cobalt alloys achieve superior wear resistance because of three essential metallurgical properties. The first property establishes a protective effect because the material maintains high hardness levels which prevent abrasive wear from bone cement particles and tissue debris. The second property establishes a hard phase reinforcement system through carbide distribution throughout the matrix which protects surface geometry during sliding contact. The third property establishes a work-hardening mechanism because the material undergoes transformation from FCC to HCP which produces a strengthened surface layer that develops under concentrated contact stress.
The wear resistance of this material demonstrates its crucial value in joint movement applications. Research shows that cobalt-chrome femoral heads produce much less polyethylene wear debris compared to other material options. The reduction of particulate debris leads to a direct decrease in both osteolysis rates and implant loosening occurrences during 15 to 20 years of operational use.
Corrosion Resistance in Physiological Environments
The chromium content in cobalt alloys forms a protective chromium oxide (Cr2O3) passive layer when exposed to body fluids. The passive film protects itself from damage because it automatically restores its original state, which stops corrosion from damaging mechanical strength and causing metal ion leakage.
Cobalt alloys show consistent corrosion rates that do not exceed 0.05 millimeters annually when tested in chloride-rich physiological environments. The resistance of the material extends to crevice conditions which occur at implant interfaces and to the fretting corrosion risk at modular connections. The addition of molybdenum to the material improves pitting resistance, which solves a typical failure problem found in less advanced alloys.
Biocompatibility Profile: Science, Testing, and Real-World Considerations

The ISO 10993 standards provide a complete framework for biocompatibility evaluation which measures how medical materials interact with living biological systems. The testing process examines three factors of cobalt-based superalloys which include cytotoxicity and sensitization potential and systemic effects from metal ions that enter the body.
Standard biocompatibility testing for CoCrMo includes cytotoxicity assays using L-929 fibroblast cell lines which require more than 70% viable cell counts to match control levels after extraction exposure. The Cell Counting Kit 8 CCK-8 method evaluates cell proliferation through measurement of metabolic activity which requires performance to maintain all reference values without decline. The study investigates how alloy extracts stimulate peripheral blood mononuclear cells to release cytokines during their response to inflammatory stimuli.
The results demonstrate that properly manufactured cobalt alloys meet biocompatibility requirements for long-term implantation according to test results. The CoCrMo extracts which researchers tested showed standardized testing results that demonstrated more than 85% cell viability. Cobalt alloys achieved this performance because decades of clinical usage established them as a biomedical standard which proved their safety.
Manufacturing Method Impact on Biocompatibility
The current research shows that established beliefs face their strongest challenge at this point. Manufacturing methods have a critical effect on how biological systems interact with cobalt alloys because modern processing techniques provide more benefits than traditional methods.
Cobalt alloy components produced through Selective Laser Melting (SLM) show better biocompatibility than those made through investment casting. The rapid solidification rates in SLM which range from 10^3 to 10^8 Kelvin per second create microstructure which results in finer grain structures and more uniform element distribution compared to the 20-100 K/s solidification rates used in casting.
The research results from peer-reviewed materials science journals provide quantitative evidence which shows these differences.
|
Manufacturing Method |
Cell Viability |
Apoptosis Rate |
Ion Release |
Surface Hardness |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Traditional Cast |
89-92% |
5.4% |
Higher |
7.15 GPa |
|
Selective Laser Melting |
95-97% |
3.5% |
Lower |
9.06 GPa |
|
Metal Injection Molding |
92-94% |
4.1% |
Low |
8.2 GPa |
The SLM-fabricated alloys demonstrate highly reduced inflammatory cytokine release because cell culture studies show lower levels of IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α. The cell morphology studies showed that SLM surfaces produced better cell adhesion with extended lamellipodia formation as cells grew on those surfaces.
The findings provide device manufacturers with useful information that they can apply to their work. The process of specifying additive manufacturing for cobalt components produces mechanical strength improvements and biocompatibility enhancements. The dual benefits of this technology enable next-generation implant systems to achieve premium market positioning.
Metal Ion Release and Clinical Concerns
The testing which showed positive biocompatibility results showed that cobalt alloy implants release metal ions into both nearby tissues and the entire body. After surgery cobalt, chromium, and molybdenum ions enter the bloodstream and urine, but their levels remain above normal after 6-12 months and fall within accepted human limits.
People continue to debate the clinical importance of this ion release process. These metals function as essential trace elements which the body can eliminate through established kidney elimination pathways. The body develops local inflammatory reactions to increased metal levels, which some patients experience, in their periprosthetic tissues.
The presence of nickel in products raises particular health risks for people who have hypersensitivity conditions. ASTM F75 standard allows a nickel content of 0.5% whereas modern ultralow-nickel grades restrict their nickel content to less than 0.01%. The special compositions which exist for people who have metal allergies reduce their risk of allergic reactions while they keep the mechanical properties which cobalt alloys provide.
Osseointegration Comparison with Titanium
Titanium and its alloys show better osseointegration results than cobalt-chrome materials. Titanium exhibits 15-30% greater bone-to-implant contact measurements according to all comparative studies. The difference occurs because titanium possesses a surface oxide chemistry that enables direct bone attachment through bioactive surface interactions.
Surface treatments enable cobalt alloys to achieve better osseointegration results. The combination of porous coatings with hydroxyapatite application and surface roughening through blasting or chemical etching methods improves bone integration. Some manufacturers apply titanium or hydroxyapatite coatings to cobalt substrates, combining the mechanical advantages of cobalt with the biological benefits of titanium surfaces.
Cobalt alloys serve as the best option for applications which require load-bearing capacity and wear resistance systems that function as articulating bearing surfaces. Cementless fixation applications which require bone bonding need titanium or coated cobalt solutions as the better option.
The 2025 Regulatory Landscape: EU MDR and Global Implications

The European Union Medical Device Regulation (MDR) 2017/745 became fully operational in May 2025 for all cobalt-based medical devices. The regulatory change designates cobalt as a CMR substance (Carcinogenic Mutagenic or Toxic to Reproduction) which activates particular rules that apply to devices which contain more than 0.1% cobalt content.
The effect on devices shows different results based on their classification. The Medical Device Directive current CE marking which exists for medical devices allows existing devices to continue market access through grandfathering rules until they need to achieve complete MDR compliance between 2027 and 2028 based on their risk classification. New devices with cobalt content need to undergo more thorough examination because notified bodies must evaluate CMR substance justification during their conformity assessment process.
The regulatory change does not create a complete prohibition. The regulation requires manufacturers to establish that their cobalt usage provides performance advantages which no other option can deliver while maintaining patient exposure at safe risk levels. Articulating joint bearings needs this justification because cobalt delivers superior wear resistance as the only available option. Regulatory forces will compel material changes when there exists comparable performance between alternative options.
Cobalt-Free Alternatives Gaining Traction
The regulatory environment has created urgent demand for cobalt-free solutions which companies are now developing at increased speed. Several material systems now compete for applications traditionally served by CoCrMo:
BioDur 108 represents a cobalt-free high-nitrogen stainless steel specifically developed for orthopedic applications. The alloy demonstrates wear resistance which comes close to cobalt-grade performance yet it eliminates all regulatory issues which arise from using cobalt. Carpenter Technology and other suppliers now offer this material with full biocompatibility certification.
Titanium-zirconium alloys provide improved wear resistance compared to standard Ti-6Al-4V while maintaining titanium’s biocompatibility advantages. These alloys target articulating surface applications where titanium historically underperformed.
The metallic substrate of oxidized zirconium provides a ceramic-like surface which meets excellent wear characteristics while eliminating all metal ion release possibilities. This material has gained significant market share in knee replacement applications.
Device manufacturers need to conduct complete testing programs for evaluating these alternative solutions. The existing cobalt solutions must be proven through wear simulator studies and biocompatibility assessment and clinical evaluation to show equal or better performance. Companies must spend large amounts of money to obtain alternative material certification because it has become essential for entering international markets.
FDA and Global Regulatory Position
The FDA in the United States applies separate regulations for cobalt alloys used in medical devices. The FDA current guidelines permit orthopedic use of cobalt-chromium materials because their safety and effectiveness have been proven according to standard biocompatibility testing methods.
ISO standards for cobalt alloy acceptance are followed by Asian markets which include Japan China and South Korea. The National Medical Products Administration in China requires that imported devices undergo domestic testing however they do not impose any specific cobalt restrictions beyond the standard biocompatibility testing requirements.
The different regulatory systems create difficulties for manufacturers who operate in multiple countries. European Union market product which uses cobalt-free materials for EU MDR compliance shows unnecessary cost and performance trade-offs when it expands to regions without matching restrictions. The need for regulatory solutions to manage different jurisdictional requirements forces companies to keep using cobalt-based products.
Clinical Applications: Where Cobalt Alloys Dominate

The selection of implant materials always involves trade-offs. The mechanical benefits of cobalt alloys make them suitable for particular situations which require their special properties. Engineers need to understand these specific situations because it enables them to choose materials more effectively.
Orthopedic Joint Replacement
Cobalt-chrome remains the dominant material for femoral heads in total hip replacement. The bearing surface must resist adhesive and abrasive wear under 3-5 times body weight loading during each gait cycle. This results in 50-100 million loading cycles over 15-20 year service periods. Cobalt provides the only material solution which delivers wear resistance together with fatigue strength for this particular application.
Cobalt alloys function as the femoral component bearing surface in total knee replacements which move against polyethylene tibial inserts. Wear resistance becomes vital because the system operates under high contact stresses and uses a conforming design. Cobalt maintains its hardness because it does not permit surface deformation which would increase polyethylene wear and produce harmful particles.
Cobalt usage has undergone a significant transformation because metal-on-metal bearing couples have become obsolete. Earlier designs paired cobalt femoral heads with cobalt acetabular cups creating metal-on-metal articulation. These systems produced dangerous amounts of metal debris which led to their replacement with metal-on-polyethylene and ceramic-on-polyethylene configurations. Cobalt is now used in modern systems which combine metal and polyethylene materials to create optimized solutions that decrease polyethylene debris through cobalt’s wear resistance.
Dental Prosthetics
Cobalt-chromium alloys supply the structural base which makes removable partial dentures (RPDs) possible for millions of patients who live throughout the world. The material provides adequate strength for thin-section frameworks which create less bulk and better comfort for patients, while its corrosion resistance protects against damage in the mouth for extended periods.
Dental cobalt alloys still rely on casting as their primary production method, although selective laser melting has started to become more popular. SLM-fabricated frameworks achieve better accuracy and biocompatibility while producing fewer metal ions than standard casting methods. The advanced manufacturing techniques provide patients who have metal sensitivities with substantial advantages.
Fixed prosthodontics uses crown and bridge frameworks as the foundation for ceramic veneering. Cobalt alloys display high modulus characteristics which deliver solid support to brittle ceramic materials and therefore decrease the probability of fractures. The coefficient of thermal expansion matches common dental ceramics, ensuring interface integrity through thermal cycling.
Cardiovascular and Spinal Applications
Cobalt alloys serve specialized roles in cardiovascular and spinal device applications. The combination of L605 (Haynes 25) and MP35N alloys provides stents with both strength and fatigue resistance which these vascular scaffolds need to expand. The high yield strength of cobalt combined with its ductility enables these applications to use this material.
Cobalt-chrome rods function as correction devices for spinal deformities while providing stabilization during surgical procedures. The multi-level construction which uses higher modulus materials shows better mechanical properties for fusion, because it creates a stronger environment. Patients who need postoperative MRI imaging should choose titanium instead of cobalt, because titanium creates fewer imaging problems than cobalt.
Manufacturing Methods: Impact on Performance and Biocompatibility
The mechanical properties and surface properties as well as the biological response of cobalt alloy components depend on the manufacturing method that engineers choose. The differences between materials processing methods help engineers select the best processing method for their particular applications.
Investment Casting (ASTM F75)
Traditional investment casting produces components that need only minimal machining because they create near-net-shape components. The process involves wax pattern creation, ceramic shell investment, vacuum induction melting, and controlled solidification. ASTM F75 establishes the casting standards for cobalt alloy materials according to its specific requirements.
Cast microstructures display coarse grain structures which contain potential casting defects that include porosity and shrinkage. The material characteristics restrict fatigue strength to lower levels than wrought materials exhibit. The casting process remains economically viable because it enables production of complicated shapes while being used in numerous orthopedic treatments which do not demand high fatigue strength.
Articulating surfaces need additional processing to achieve the required surface finish from casting. The roughness of as-cast surfaces exceeds the maximum threshold which allows their use in bearing applications. The sub-micron surface finishes necessary for articulating joints get achieved through machining combined with grinding and polishing operations.
Wrought and Forged Alloys (ASTM F1537)
Wrought processing through forging or bar stock machining produces superior mechanical properties. The deformation process destroys cast grain patterns which leads to the formation of smaller microstructures that enhance fatigue resistance. ASTM F1537 defines these wrought alloys which have higher strength limits than cast materials.
Forged cobalt alloys exceed 1,200 MPa tensile strength while their fatigue performance reaches double that of their cast counterparts. The combination of these properties makes wrought alloys necessary for high-stress applications which include femoral stems and spinal rods that face cyclic loading.
The trade-off comes in manufacturing complexity and cost. The process of wrought processing requires extensive machining work which transforms billet stock into finished products while creating large amounts of wasted material.
Additive Manufacturing: Selective Laser Melting
The most important progress in medical cobalt alloy processing emerges from developments in selective laser melting technology. This powder-bed fusion process uses gas-atomized powder to build components through successive layer creation which produces complex shapes that traditional manufacturing methods cannot achieve.
The SLM process produces microstructures with distinct solidification patterns because it rapidly solidifies materials. The refined structure produces hardness values which exceed cast alloys by 25 to 30 percent. Optimized processing parameters minimize porosity while achieving densities above 99.9 percent.
Multiple studies have confirmed that SLM processing produces materials with better biocompatibility than other methods. The uniform microstructure decreases galvanic potentials which lead to corrosion. The layer-by-layer building method creates a surface topography which enhances cell attachment. The optimized scanning methods create less residual stress which results in reduced distortion and cracking.
SLM technology provides device makers with the ability to create customized implants and implant designs which include porous elements that improve bone integration. The technology enables manufacturers to produce low-volume items without incurring tooling expenses while allowing design changes to proceed without creating molds and achieving surface finishes which need less finishing work.
Material Selection Framework for Engineers

The process of selecting between cobalt alloys and other options depends on the need to assess three factors which include application requirements and patient characteristics and regulatory demands.
Cobalt-Chrome should be specified in situations which require the following:
- Wear resistance is critical: Articulating bearing surfaces, sliding contacts, abrasive environments
- Maximum fatigue strength required: High-cycle loading, thin-section designs, safety-critical components
- Structural rigidity needed: Deformity correction, load-bearing fixation, dimensional stability
- Long service life expected: Younger patients, high-activity levels, revision surgery avoidance
Consider Alternatives When:
- Metal sensitivity documented: Patient history of allergic response to cobalt, chromium, or nickel
- Maximum osseointegration priority: Cementless fixation applications, poor bone quality patients
- MRI compatibility essential: Postoperative imaging requirements, oncology or infection monitoring
- Regulatory simplicity desired: EU market access without CMR substance justification
Specifying Custom CoCrMo Alloys
The creation of custom alloy specifications enables solutions for particular application requirements when standard grades fail to fulfill essential standards. The required specification elements include:
- Chemical composition ranges: Tightening allowable ranges for critical elements, which specify ultralow nickel grades for sensitive applications, or which determine carbide-forming elements for specific wear characteristics.
- Mechanical property targets: Establishing minimum fatigue strength, hardness ranges, or ductility requirements beyond standard specifications.
- Surface finish requirements: Defining acceptable roughness parameters, which specify surface treatment protocols, and which establish coating requirements.
- Testing and certification: Requiring specific biocompatibility testing, mechanical property verification, or full traceability documentation.
A metallurgical partner who specializes in medical alloy supply can assist to create reliable material delivery through their experience with custom specifications and complete documentation process.
Quality Assurance from the Supplier Perspective
Medical device manufacturers require suppliers who understand the critical nature of implant materials. The testing process for cobalt alloys requires multiple assessments which include standard commercial testing along with specific testing needs for long-term human implantation.
The testing methods
The spectral analysis process identifies chemical components based on established specification standards. The advanced techniques of optical emission spectroscopy and inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry deliver exact measurements of elemental content. The process uses combustion methods to analyze carbon and sulfur which maintains carbide levels needed for mechanical property testing.
The mechanical testing process assesses tensile strength and yield strength together with elongation and hardness testing. For critical applications, fatigue testing must be conducted under conditions that replicate physiological loading. These tests confirm that processing has achieved the intended microstructure and properties.
The biocompatibility testing procedure follows ISO 10993 standards which provide assurance for each material lot. The process uses three tests which include cytotoxicity testing and sensitization assays and systemic toxicity evaluation to confirm that all processing contaminants do not pose any biological safety risks.
Traceability and Documentation
The system permits complete traceability which follows raw materials until their final processing stage. The complete device manufacturing process requires permanent records that connect heat numbers with processing details and testing outcomes.
Medical material supply requires ISO 13485 quality management systems which establish the operational framework. The standard of ISO 9001 applies to all organizations while the standard of ISO 13485 creates additional rules to regulate medical devices through contamination management and risk assessment and documentation for compliance with regulations.
International supply chains require export documentation which contains certificates of origin and material certifications and statements that confirm regulatory compliance. The documentation process becomes manageable for experienced suppliers who handle all requirements needed to complete customs clearance while ensuring their materials meet the requirements needed for the destination market.
Partnering for Success
The process of selecting a medical alloy supplier requires assessment of multiple factors which include delivery times and product costs. Successful partnerships depend on technical expertise in metallurgical engineering together with established quality systems and specialized knowledge of medical device industry standards.
The ideal supplier provides consultation services for material specification while delivering manufacturing method selection assistance and immediate support for customer inquiries. The partnership approach decreases potential risks while it fast-tracks the development process of new device projects.
Ready to specify cobalt-based superalloys for your medical device project? Our metallurgical engineers can provide detailed technical data, custom alloy specifications, and comprehensive quality documentation. Please contact us to discuss your application requirements.
Conclusion

Cobalt-based superalloys remain the preferred material for high-durability medical uses because of ongoing changes in medical regulation. The material solution provides outstanding wear resistance together with high fatigue strength and complete protection against corrosion which no other material can deliver.
Key takeaways for engineers and procurement professionals:
- The manufacturing methods determine both the mechanical characteristics and biocompatibility of products with selective laser melting providing benefits for both properties.
- The 2025 EU MDR classification of cobalt as a CMR substance requires strategic planning but does not eliminate viable applications for these materials.
- Cobalt-free materials such as BioDur 108 and advanced titanium alloys have increased their use in applications where cobalt does not provide the best performance.
- Surface treatments together with advanced manufacturing techniques enable the solution of biocompatibility issues while maintaining the mechanical benefits of cobalt.
- Medical alloy suppliers must demonstrate full traceability together with ISO 13485 quality systems.
Implant material selection requires advanced techniques which match particular application needs instead of traditional material options. Cobalt alloys will continue serving critical roles where their unique properties provide essential performance, even as the materials portfolio expands to address regulatory and biological considerations.
[Contact Our Metallurgical Engineering Team] for technical consultation on cobalt alloy selection, custom specifications, and quality assurance for your medical device applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
Are cobalt implants safe?
Yes. Cobalt-chromium alloys have shown their safety through more than 50 years of clinical use which covered more than 1 million implant procedures. ISO 10993 biocompatibility testing confirms these materials meet requirements for long-term implantation. The implementation of modern manufacturing techniques which include selective laser melting has enhanced biocompatibility through its ability to create advanced microstructures and decrease ion release.
How does manufacturing method affect cobalt alloy biocompatibility?
The biological response to a manufacturing method shows a strong connection to its production technique. The alloys produced through selective laser melting demonstrate 95 to 97 percent cell viability, whereas traditional casting methods result in 89 to 92 percent cell viability. The process of rapid solidification during additive manufacturing produces smaller grain structures that achieve uniform elemental distribution, which leads to reduced inflammatory cytokine production and better cell adhesion.
What is the difference between ASTM F75 and F1537?
ASTM F75 specifies cast cobalt-chromium-molybdenum alloy which manufacturers produce through investment casting. ASTM F1537 covers wrought cobalt alloys which manufacturers create through forging and bar stock processing. The deformation processing of wrought alloys results in enhanced fatigue strength and hardness because it produces smaller microstructural features.
Can cobalt alloys be used in MRI?
Cobalt alloys are generally considered MRI conditional. The materials show non-ferromagnetic properties which make them safe for MRI use. The materials create major imaging artifacts which have the potential to hide nearby body structures. Titanium is the better choice for applications which need MRI evaluation after surgery because it produces fewer imaging artifacts.
What are the alternatives to cobalt-chrome implants?
Several alternatives address specific applications: titanium and titanium alloys for general orthopedic fixation, BioDur 108 cobalt-free stainless steel for wear applications, oxidized zirconium for knee bearings, and ceramic materials for femoral heads. The three alternatives which exist for this project require assessment of their mechanical characteristics and biocompatibility and manufacturing difficulties which need to be checked against particular use cases.